Pie2D

Pie2D (2D Pie) chart type is a classic yet effective chart type used to quickly visualize how a whole is distributed among sub-components in percentage and visual terms. It is suitable for SCADA, power generation, and executive summary screens, particularly for presenting ratios, shares, and contributions.

Basic Data Logic of Pie2D

  • A single total value is distributed among its subcategories.
  • Sub-components are displayed as slices of a circle.
  • The total distribution is normally considered 100%.
  • Each slice represents the share of the corresponding category within the total.
  • Values can be expressed as absolute values (MW, MWh, units, etc.) or relative values (%).
Pie2D example distribution chart Coal — %35 Natural Gas — %30 Hydro — %20 Solar — %10 Wind — %5

Use Cases in SCADA and Energy Systems

Overall Power Generation – Source Distribution

With values such as Coal 35%, Natural Gas 30%, Hydro 20%, Solar 10%, and Wind 5%, source shares in total generation can be displayed in a single chart.

What does it show? It quickly shows how much each source contributes to total generation.

Alarm Distribution

Turbine alarms 40%, boiler 25%, electrical system 20%, and auxiliary systems 15% can be used to summarize the distribution of the alarm load.

Failure / Shutdown Causes

A distribution such as Mechanical 45%, Electrical 30%, Automation 15%, and External Causes 10% shows which causes account for the largest share of shutdowns.

Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP) Use Cases

Turbine Shares in Total Generation

  • Turbine-1 → %38
  • Turbine-2 → %34
  • Turbine-3 → %28

Comment: It shows which turbine contributes more to generation and whether there is a significant imbalance in load distribution.

Plant Operating Status Distribution

  • Normal Operation → %62
  • Partial Load → %18
  • Maintenance → %12
  • Failure → %8

Advantage: The overall operating status of the plant can be summarized at a glance.

Water Use Distribution

  • Power Generation → %72
  • Ecological Flow → %18
  • Spillway Loss → %10

Operational Value: The share of environmental and operational obligations, such as ecological flow requirements, becomes visible within total water use.

Distribution of Energy Losses by Cause

  • Maintenance Shutdown → %40
  • Low Flow → %30
  • Grid Constraint → %20
  • Failure → %10

Strategic Value: By identifying the categories in which losses are concentrated, improvement priorities can be established.

Alarm Type Distribution

  • Mechanical → %45
  • Electrical → %35
  • Hydraulic → %15
  • SCADA → %5

From a Maintenance Perspective: Which discipline generates more alarms and therefore a higher operational workload can be monitored.

Annual Generation Distribution by Source – Cascade HPP

  • Main River → %55
  • Tributary → %25
  • Regulator → %20

From a Basin Management Perspective: The relative contribution of water sources to generation can be seen more clearly.

Maintenance Type Shares

  • Planned → %65
  • Unplanned → %25
  • Emergency → %10

Maturity Indicator: A decrease in the unplanned maintenance rate is not sufficient on its own as a performance measure, but it can be meaningful when assessing the development of maintenance planning discipline.

Pie3D

Pie3D (3D Pie) chart type uses the same distribution logic as Pie2D, but presents it with a 3D perspective and depth effect. The fundamental purpose remains to show the distribution of a whole among its sub-components, while Pie3D is more focused on presentation and visual impact.

The data logic is the same as Pie2D; the fundamental difference is not in data calculation but in how the distribution is presented visually. Therefore, Pie3D is more suitable for executive presentations and summary dashboard screens than for technical analysis.

Use Cases in SCADA and Energy Systems

Power Generation – Source Shares

An example of Coal 40%, Natural Gas 30%, Hydro 15%, Solar 10%, and Wind 5% can provide an executive view of the overall generation composition at a glance.

Alarm Distribution

A summary such as Electrical 45%, Mechanical 35%, and Automation 20% helps a non-technical audience quickly understand the alarm load.

HPP Examples:

  • Turbine generation share: Turbine-1 40%, Turbine-2 35%, Turbine-3 25%.
  • Plant operating status: Normal Operation 60%, partial load 20%, maintenance 12%, failure 8%.
  • Water use: Power Generation 70%, ecological flow 20%, spillway loss 10%.
  • Energy losses: Maintenance Shutdown 45%, Low Flow 30%, Grid Constraint 15%, Failure 10%.
  • Alarm types: Mechanical 45%, Electrical 35%, Hydraulic 15%, SCADA 5%.
  • Cascade HPP generation contribution: Main River 55%, Tributary 25%, Regulator 20%.
  • Maintenance types: Planned 65%, Unplanned 25%, Emergency 10%.

Doughnut2D

Doughnut2D (2D Doughnut / Donut) chart type is the hollow-centered version of Pie2D. The center area allows the chart not only to show the distribution, but also to highlight a secondary key item such as total value, KPI, status label, or date/shift information. This makes it particularly useful in dashboard design.

Basic Structure

  • There is no X–Y axis.
  • It is category-based.
  • Slices are proportional in size.
  • The center area can be used for total value, KPI, status label, or date/shift information.
Doughnut2D example distribution chart Total 1,250 MWh Coal — %40 Natural Gas — %30 Hydro — %20 Solar — %10

Use Cases in SCADA and Energy Systems

Generation Source Distribution + Total

On the ring, Coal 40%, Natural Gas 30%, Hydro 20%, and Solar 10% are displayed, while Total Generation: 1,250 MWh can be displayed in the center.

Alarm Distribution + Total Alarms

At the center of the Electrical 45%, Mechanical 35%, and Automation 20% distribution, a KPI such as Total Alarms: 3,480 can be displayed.

Shutdown Causes + Total Shutdown Duration

With a distribution of Mechanical 50%, Electrical 30%, and External Causes 20%, the center can show Total: 18.6 hours.

HPP Use Cases

Turbine Shares in Total Generation + Total MW

  • Turbine-1 → %42
  • Turbine-2 → %35
  • Turbine-3 → %23

Center information: Total generation = 96 MW.

This combines the distribution and total power in the same visualization, enabling the load sharing to be assessed quickly.

Plant Operating Status + Availability Rate

  • Normal Operation → %60
  • Partial Load → %22
  • Maintenance → %12
  • Failure → %6

Center information: Plant Availability = %82.

Water Use Distribution + Legal Share Highlight

  • Power Generation → %70
  • Ecological Flow → %20
  • Spillway Loss → %10

Center information: Ecological Share = %20.

Distribution of Energy Losses by Cause

  • Maintenance Shutdown → %40
  • Low Flow → %30
  • Grid Constraint → %20
  • Failure → %10

Center information: Total Loss = 18.4 GWh.

Alarm Type Distribution + Total Alarm Count

  • Mechanical → %45
  • Electrical → %35
  • Hydraulic → %15
  • SCADA → %5

Center information: Total Alarms = 1,248.

Annual Generation Distribution by Source – Cascade HPP

  • Main River → %55
  • Tributary → %25
  • Regulator → %20

This view can be used to summarize the relative contribution of different water sources within the basin to total generation on a management screen.

Maintenance Type Distribution + Maturity Indicator

  • Planned → %65
  • Unplanned → %25
  • Emergency → %10

The unplanned maintenance rate is one of the indicators that can be used to monitor the development of maintenance management, but it is not sufficient on its own to determine operational maturity.

Doughnut3D

Doughnut3D (3D Doughnut / Donut) chart type is the 3D perspective and depth-effect version of Doughnut2D. Thus, both the distribution and the main metric in the center can be presented in the same visualization. As with Pie3D, the primary advantage of Doughnut3D lies less in analytical precision than in presentation and visual impact.

Key Features: There is no X–Y axis; it is category-based; it can show the distribution in a single time or status snapshot; it includes 3D depth and perspective; the center area can be used to highlight total, KPI, or status information.

Use Cases in SCADA and Energy Systems

Power Generation – Source Distribution + Total

A distribution of Coal 38%, Natural Gas 32%, Hydro 18%, and Solar 12%, together with Total Generation: 1,480 MWh in the center, can provide a quick composition summary on an executive screen.

Alarm Distribution + Total Alarms

An alarm distribution including categories such as Mechanical 34% and Automation 20% can be supported in the center with Total Alarms: 3,920.

Shutdown Durations + Total

At the center of the Mechanical 50%, Electrical 30%, and External Causes 20% distribution, Total Shutdown: 21.4 hours can be displayed.

HPP Use Cases

Turbine Shares in Total Generation + Total MW

  • Turbine-1 → %42
  • Turbine-2 → %35
  • Turbine-3 → %23

Center information: Total generation = 96 MW.

This structure combines the relative generation contribution of the turbines and the instantaneous total power in the same visualization for quick comparison.

Plant Operating Status + Availability Rate

  • Normal Operation → %60
  • Partial Load → %22
  • Maintenance → %12
  • Failure → %6

Center information: Plant Availability = %82.

Water Use Distribution + Legal Share Highlight

  • Power Generation → %70
  • Ecological Flow → %20
  • Spillway Loss → %10

Center information: Ecological Share = %20.

Distribution of Energy Losses by Cause

  • Maintenance Shutdown → %40
  • Low Flow → %30
  • Grid Constraint → %20
  • Failure → %10

Center information: Total Loss = 18.4 GWh.

Alarm Type Distribution + Total Alarm Count

  • Mechanical → %45
  • Electrical → %35
  • Hydraulic → %15
  • SCADA → %5

Center information: Total Alarms = 1,248.

Annual Generation Distribution by Source – Cascade HPP

  • Main River → %55
  • Tributary → %25
  • Regulator → %20

From a basin management perspective, the relative contribution of water sources to generation can be summarized with this distribution.

Maintenance Type Distribution + Maturity Indicator

  • Planned → %65
  • Unplanned → %25
  • Emergency → %10

Monitoring the unplanned maintenance rate can provide a meaningful indication of the planning level of maintenance processes.

Comparison of Pie and Doughnut Charts

The basic data logic of the four chart types is the same: showing the distribution of a total across categories. The difference is mainly in the 2D/3D presentation format and, for Doughnut types, the ability to use the center area for additional information.

Chart Axes Visual Structure Center KPI Primary Use
Pie2D No X–Y 2D pie No Analytical distribution summary
Pie3D No X–Y 3D pie No Presentation and visual impact
Doughnut2D No X–Y 2D doughnut Yes Dashboard + KPI + distribution
Doughnut3D No X–Y 3D doughnut Yes Presentation + KPI + visual impact

Technical Assessment: Pie and doughnut charts are not designed to show time series or the relationship between two variables. When examining changes over time, trends, correlations, scatter distributions, or sudden deviations, appropriate chart types such as Line, Area, and Scatter should be preferred.

Practical Selection for HPP Applications: A turbine's contribution to total generation, the proportion of alarm causes, the distribution of maintenance types, or the categorical share of water use can be presented clearly with Pie2D/Doughnut2D. When the same information is intended for an executive presentation with stronger visual impact, Pie3D/Doughnut3D can be preferred. If a KPI such as total MW, MWh, alarm count, or availability rate is to be highlighted in the center, the Doughnut family provides a more suitable presentation.

← Back to Previous Content